I.Conversos, Marranos,Practicing Jews and "zionists"-Definitions
The idea of Jews converting to another 'religion' or way of life is not new, and has
been around since the historical beginning of the Jews. Separation issues have figured
forefront from the beginning, and The Torah contains many commandments against intermarriage,
and worship with those of other beliefs, teaching against the 'polluting' of Judaism
with other gods and practices.
Even before early Christians appeared on the scene, concerns of 'hellenization' came into
view, with some seeing Greek influence as a positive move towards intellectual integration and
others saw it as a great threat to the purity of Judaism. With the advent of Jesus Christ, or
Y'shua HaMeschiach, [Jesus the Messiah], the issue of conversion became eminent: Jesus was Jewish,
his followers were Jewish, and the community and world to which He came was Jewish. Since the
first churches of Jewish believers, some saw the new 'conversions' as the radical fulfillment of
true and complete Judaism, while others in the religious hierarchy saw the rapidly spreading
faith as dangerous and threatening. Jewish believers in Jesus Christ have always had the most
difficult position of believers: they are rejected of the Jewish community and often either rejected
or severely misunderstood by the Christian gentile community. Additionally, as history progressed,
political expediency of belief or particularly baptism [most often Roman Catholic] was added to the fray,
and the genuineness of conversions came into question by both Jews and non-Jews, due to special
protections and pardons afforded only those 'baptised' including State and Church positions, notably in
the arts, ownership of property, parenthood, and safety from punishments directed towards Jews and heretics.
The varieties of conditions are generally divided into :
1. Practicing Jews2. Converted Jews [conversos]
3. "Marranos" or those Jews who consented to
Catholic rituals but inwardly or secretly continued the practice of Judaism, and probably a reasonable fourth category,
4. Jews who are racially or culturally Jews, but do not hold to traditional Judaic beliefs. A fifth category which
may overlap the others includes
5. Zionists, or notably politically oriented and zealous Jews, focused upon the preservation of the Jewish people and Israel,
although as noted this is not a separate category but a 'focus' with adherents in each of the other categories. Even
pro-Israel Christians can be seen under the rubric 'zionist' which refers more to a goal and philosophy of reaching that
goal, although many Orthodox Jews have contentions with Zionists over issues of God's Sovereignty vs Man's efforts in obtaining
those goals.
Practicing Jews
Practicing Jews may be defined widely as those adhering to the doctrinal tenets of Judaism. The general divisions of Judaism
are seen as Reform or Liberal, Conservative, Orthodox and Hasidic, a form of orthodoxy. There is also a recent trend towards
'philosophical' humanistic Judaism, with its roots in the Jewish Enlightenment in which practice and belief are less tied.
There are also of course as with most major religions, subdivisions of the divisions. Practicing Jews during the Shoah differed
among themselves, and the debate between more Orthodox branches which practiced separation and Torah observance, and the more
liberal which felt that Jews should inculturate into contemporary non-Jewish cultures became eminent, and probably contributed
at times to less protection for the Jewish community. (See
The Jewish
Enlightenment and the Shoah) These members of the Jewish community, regardless of widely differing perspectives, continued
in their Jewish identities throughout the war, with perhaps momentary exceptions for temporal escapes. They faired of course less
well than certain of their counterpoints, although that in part depended early in the war upon whether or not they were of wealth
or had some powerful connections, and managed an escape early. Later in the war though, most of the escapes for practicing Jews
came from either Jewish relief organizations, or from individuals or resistance groups. While these rescuers saved many, they also
put their lives on the line each time they aided refugees, so the numbers of escapes were fewer than the more widely touted Church-aided
escapes.
II. Marranos
The word 'marranos' is an old term from Spain and Portugal around the time of the Spanish Inquisition but has remained
extant. 1 It referred to those who converted for political expediency, to stay alive or keep position or property. The
Marranos, would comply with outward signs such as rituals, liturgy, icons, and the like but would inwardly maintain their adherence
to Judaism, often even worshipping in secret. In the Inquisition, secret worship and judaic practices were outlawed and if
a 'convert' was caught in clandestine practice, it could be punishable by death. While not often called 'Marranos' by the
general public, the issue of 'expedient baptism' was forefront in the rescue of the Jews in WWII, as Churches used 'conversion'
to placate authorities in requesting release and relief for illegally detained Jewish citizens, and especially for children hidden
in convents and orphanages by Catholics as their parents were deported. Recent media attention noted that a continuing controversy
was involved in the baptizing [pedobaptism]] of Jewish children, as Pius XII declared that the children should not be returned to
their parents upon the slim chance of their parents return. The Vatican argued that their interest in the religious education and
upbringing of baptised Catholics shadowed the parents rights upon return often with years elapsed.2 More will be discussed
regarding this issue, and it is dissimilar to include children making professions under unusual circumstances, with adults on both
sides understanding political expediency to save lives.ref2
III.Jews who Did not Profess Judaism
During the beginning years of the 20th century, a spiritual 'revolution' occurred within Judaism in which Jewish influence
such as Marx [a professing Lutheran but Jew by birth], Moses Mendelssohn and others such as Sigmund Freud argued for a 'freeing'
from religious constraints and the ability of individual Jews to retain Jewish identity but to redefine the meaning of being
Jewish. Most often Jews influenced by the Jewish Enlightenment established in part by Spinoza, were Jews involved in academics,
intellectualism and the arts who wished greater liberty in observance of the tenets of Judaism, and dismissing separation issues
as unnecessary. Sigmund Freud, expressive of one extreme maintained a lifelong synagogue membership and donations to B'nai Brith,
but professed openly that he did not believe in God. Mendelssohn [earlier] presented more of a middle position in which he admonished
Jews to enculturate, but to hold fast the the faith of their fathers.
Racial vs Political and Religious Views of the Jews
One of the reasons for great confusion over whether the Vatican aided Jews in the Holocaust is based upon tolerance
which was based upon RACIAL vs POLITICAL and religious points of view. It is traditionally held by historians, that
Vatican policy towards the Jew throughout history has not been kind. Historically, the Jews have been seen as adversaries
both from a doctrinal point of view, in which their rejection of Jesus as Messiah is mention, all the way to being
guilty of Deicide, or the 'death of God' a misnomer gained from referral to an early letter called Peri Pascha , in which the Bishop of Sardis
in which a pleading was made regarding the Jews to return to their God, but which was interpreted afterwards as a call
for condemnation for their killing of Christ. [See also
The Culpability for
Christ's Death]. The Church throughout history had several complaints about their 'elder brothers' the Jews:
Traditional Vatican Issues Regarding the Jews
- Their Rejection of Christ
- Their Place as the Chosen People of God
- Their role/office as the Oracles of God to whom belonged the Prophecies, covenants, etc
- Their role as the rightful owners of Israel and Jerusalem and
- Their practice of Judaism which came to be seen as odd, superstitious and eccentric, and
sometimes even acquainted with sedition and witchcraft.
.II.Racial vs Religious Concerns for the Vatican
One of the greatest confusions in understanding the Vatican's position regarding the Jews in general and during the holocaust,
(this is an issue which varies for all Christians as well), is in the division between viewing the Jews as a Racial/Ethnic Group
vs viewing the Jews as practicers of Judaism, or in other words, a religious issue. To some degree, this discussion has been
problematic to all religions and nations throughout time, because even the Jews have had their own internal debates about where
the borders of Jewishness lie. Modern Catholicism, though, and even some historical positions have regarded the Jews as worthy
of protection and favor as the 'elder brothers' of Christianity in a racial sense, [albeit 'disinherited'], but are still divorced
by views opposed to the Jews on religious grounds.
Part of this division in outlook is understandable and could be seen conversely: the Jews, also do not identify Christianity in general
or Vatican views as true to Judaism: while there is often reviling on both sides regarding religious differences, it is partly
worthy of the attitude and partly not: our religious differences such as views of Messiah and issues of liturgy and practice
separate us: this is understandable. What instigates Anti-Semitic attitudes or even Anti-Christian attitudes goes beyond the
realm of doctrine and into personal approaches to dealing with differences. One can be tolerant on either side without compromise.
What clouds the issue of hateful attitudes based upon doctrinal and religious boundaries is one of 'agreeing to disagree' vs
is one of actions and world views: for some the differences are held in a delicate balance until the fulfillment of all things
[Mystery of the Jews, e.g.], but for others on either side, either position is seen as enmity. The second position unfortunately
often prevails, is that because Vatican and some Christian doctrine seems to disavow the Jew, and because for centuries those
differences have been met with violence and prejudice, including genocide, that those religious differences create enmity which
is difficult to reconcile.
Understanding this fine distinction, makes it a little easier to address whether the Vatican aided the Jews, and if so,
which Jews, under which circumstances. Jews who were converted to Catholicism willingly before or during the war, at least
in the beginning were seen as practicing Catholics who could be helped under the auspices of their religious 'protectorate'
the Catholic Church. However, before the war was over, the Third Reich had pronounced some severe restrictions on what the
Reich considered a Jew, including Converts and what the Vatican did. The Third Reich defined Jews almost entirely by racial
characteristics, the measures and definitions of which were formally set forth and 'diagnosed' as one would a disease.
[See Eugenics] The practice of religious Judaism was also prohibited
eventually, including those married or related to Jewish persons. In 19.. the Reich put pressure on Catholic pastors to either
separate or deny the Sacrament of Holy Communion to Jewish Converts, even of long standing. In a number of German Catholic
Churches, Jewish converts were forced to take a separate communion during the same service, and some were not allowed to
kneel at a front altar rail. 3 As the war progressed, and depending on the country, even the converted Jews lost
special protection of the Vatican under occupation. It is interesting to note, that among the concessions the Vatican made
in some areas, was to allow Hitler's men input in the choosing of Bishops and even nuncios, and this was often a condition of
Vatican presence under occupation. The division in then Czechoslavakia was an example of this. 4
Race Vs Religion

All of the above descriptions lead to the basic criteria and typology of anti-semitism which at least on the surface divided
the National Socialists and the Vatican. Since the early 1920s, the Roman Catholic Church like many of its protestant counterparts
had attended to issues of racial prejudice, and much of the concern was focused on the US and other prominent areas around the
world. In Rome at the time, there was more than discussion. The Jesuit priest, LaFarge, whose father was a noted painter,
had risen early in his career to eminence, writing particularly in the area of Catholic approaches to race, although he dealt
mostly with Afro-American issues. It was LaFarge and three others who helped draft what is called the "hidden encyclical", the
document
[Humanitas Generus Unum] which some give little credibility to and others feel that it would have caused a significant turn in post-Berlin Concordat
issues in standing against unwarranted Nazi changes in concessions. Ledochowski

the then Jesuit general, intercepted the document which lay on the desk of Pius XI on the day of his death. Pius XI 's sudden
and questioned death, resulted in the disappearance of the document and its influence of strong objection to Nazi racial
policies and definitions, and Pius XII quickly took office, completing his directive to his former comrades in Berlin to "leave
the German question to him".
REFERENCES
1Wiesenthal, S. Sails of Hope
2Shoaheducation.com: Holocaust in the News: "Vatican Letter Regarding Non-return of Jewish Children Controversial:
http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/world/10545261.htm
ref1Pedobaptism is the theological term used to denote baby baptism from the root pedo (child) and baptism which
comes from the word 'baptizo' and refers to a total immersion or overwhelming. It is controversial even among Christians as most
fundamental Christians consider the infant incapable of choice and willing belief, and instead hold 'infant dedications' parallel to
the dedication of Jesus in the Temple, while others, such as orthodox Presbyterians and Catholics hold it to be a legitimate baptism
in which the promise of salvation by choice in inherent in the infant baptism. The Catholic Church additionally sees one of its main
functions as the education and training of Catholics, so that they do not err from Vatican teachings, so the conflict arose when parents
who willing [or without knowledge] had their Jewish children placed in orphanages returned after suffering the camps to their one joyous
expectation of reunion with their children, were met by caretakers unwilling to entrust Catholic upbringing to Jewish parents. It has
caused bad blood ever since, and a decided unwillingness to leave children with non-Jews in future crises.
31Zuccotti, Susan Under his Very Windows: The Vatican and the Holocaust in Italy: New Haven: Yale
U Press, 2000
42Morley, J. Vatican Diplomacy and the Jews during the Holocaust: 1939-1943;
ref2The Vatican has always held then and now that no baptisms were of political expediency, and in several cases had their nuncios
answer to their attended nations assuring them of this, often setting certain safeguards in place such as lengthy new convert classes
and catechisms. However in several cases, large numbers of Jews were baptised giving them the protectorate of the
nunciatures. This is in conjunction with the difficulty the Nazis had with 'converted Jews', and in Germany and other occupied
areas, Jews, even converted were to be seen as racial Jews before issues of religion, so that enacted laws allowed converted Jews to be treated the
same as nonconverts.